From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Mankin

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 19, 1926
15 F.2d 1019 (4th Cir. 1926)

Opinion

No. 2541.

November 19, 1926.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap; Henry Clay McDowell, Judge.

R.T. Irvine, of Big Stone Gap, Va. (A.A. Skeen, of Clintwood, Va., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

George C. Sutherland, of Clintwood, Va. (S.H. Sutherland, C. Rufus McCoy, Roland E. Chase, S.H. George C. Sutherland, and Chase McCoy, all of Clintwood, Va., on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before WADDILL and ROSE, Circuit Judges, and McCLINTIC, District Judge.


The plaintiff in error, the defendant below, has no cause to complain of the rulings of the District Court taken as a whole, and his adversary has not sued out a cross-writ.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Mankin

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 19, 1926
15 F.2d 1019 (4th Cir. 1926)
Case details for

Smith v. Mankin

Case Details

Full title:J.C. SMITH, Plaintiff in Error, v. Speed MANKIN, Defendant in Error

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 1926

Citations

15 F.2d 1019 (4th Cir. 1926)

Citing Cases

Ullman Bros. v. State

' In the latter instruments it has appeared under the head of 'Legislative Department.' In Smith v. Speed, 50…