From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Lyon

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1880
82 N.C. 2 (N.C. 1880)

Opinion

(January Term, 1880.)

Practice — Appeal to Supreme Court.

An appeal to this court must be taken to the next term after it is granted in the court below.

( State v. Hawkins, 72 N.C. 180, cited and approved.)

MOTION to dismiss an Appeal heard at January Term, 1880, of THE SUPREME COURT.

Messrs. Geo. V. Strong and S. G. Ryan, for plaintiff.

Messrs. Battle Mordecai and J. B. Batchelor, for defendants.


At February term, 1879, of the superior court of Wake county, a judgment was rendered (by Eure, J., presiding) in behalf of the defendants in a civil action then depending, wherein Hilliard J. Smith is plaintiff, and James J. Lyon, Wiley Lyon and William Jackson, administrator of Lewis Jackson deceased, are defendants. From this judgment the plaintiff prayed for and obtained an appeal, but no transcript of the record of the case was sent up until the present term of this court. The defendants' counsel now move to dismiss the case upon the ground the appeal has not been prosecuted in apt time.


The law requires that appeals to the supreme court shall be taken to the next term after the appeal is prayed for and granted in the court below. The appeal in this case should have been taken to June term, 1879, of this court and the transcript then filed, but as the plaintiff has failed to do so, he has lost his appeal. State v. Hawkins, 72 N.C. 180. The motion is sustained and the appeal dismissed. Let this be certified to the superior court of Wake.

PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Lyon

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1880
82 N.C. 2 (N.C. 1880)
Case details for

Smith v. Lyon

Case Details

Full title:H.J. SMITH v. J. J. LYON and others

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1880

Citations

82 N.C. 2 (N.C. 1880)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Seagle

Remarks of RUFFIN, J., upon the method of perfecting appeals so as to take the case without the jurisdiction…

Suiter v. Brittle

Where counsel appear specially, the entry should state the special purpose; but a failure to so state it from…