From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1937
252 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

October 6, 1937.

Present — Sears, P.J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.


Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Appeal from order denying plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment dismissed as academic. Memorandum: The lease was terminated, and the relation of landlord and tenant ceased when defendant was ejected from the premises by summary proceedings. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1434.) The lessee defendant still remained liable to the lessor plaintiff, but the liability was for damages, not for rent ( Hermitage Co. v. Lavine, 248 N.Y. 333), and the action was prematurely brought. ( Lenco, Inc., v. Hirschfeld, 247 N.Y. 44.) The case of Kottler v. N.Y. Bargain House, Inc. ( 242 N.Y. 29) is not in point, because in that case there was no eviction. The case of McCready v. Lindenborn ( 172 N.Y. 400) is not in point because, though there the action was for damages and not for rent, the lease clearly provided that damages should be ascertained and collected from month to month. Plaintiff in this case must wait until the end of the leasing period before suing for damages. All concur. (One order denies plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment; the other order denies defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, in an action to recover rentals due.)


Summaries of

Smith v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1937
252 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Smith v. Frank

Case Details

Full title:THERESA C. SMITH and CHARLOTTE M. SMITH, Respondents, Appellants, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1937

Citations

252 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co., Inc.

Liability for use and occupation is not liability for rent under a lease. ( Peoples Trust Co. v. Schultz N.…

Hackbarth v. Ross

There is no reason, apart from a statutory prohibition, why the law with respect to actions for breach of a…