Opinion
Case No. 11-cv-9147
09-05-2017
ROBERT SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ROSEBUD FARMSTAND, et al., Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff's motion to execute and enter memorandum of judgment [366] is denied. In the federal courts, final judgments entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 are entered on a specific form, the AO-450. See Selective Ins. Co. v. City of Paris, 769 F.3d 501, 507 (7th Cir. 2014). The final judgment in this case [339] was entered in conformity with that procedure. Execution on a money judgment is covered in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69, and the Court is not aware of any role that a "memorandum of judgment" such as that requested by Plaintiff might play in carrying out the procedures referenced in Rule 69. Notice of motion date of 9/6/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. Dated: September 5, 2017
/s/_________
Robert M. Dow, Jr.
United States District Judge