From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Experian Info. Sols.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 3, 2023
1:22-cv-06960-VSB (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-06960-VSB

04-03-2023

ANDREW FREDERICK SMITH, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., TRANS UNION, LLC; and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., Defendants.

JONES DAY Alissa M. Fideli


JONES DAY

Alissa M. Fideli

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY THIS ACTION

In resolving a motion to compel arbitration, courts apply a standard “similar to that applicable for a motion for summary judgment.” Levy v. Credit Plus, Inc., No. 21-CV-5541 (KMK), 2023 WL 2644352, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2023) (citation and quotation marks omitted). Under this standard, I must evaluate the allegations related to the question of whether the parties formed a valid arbitration agreement to determine whether they raise a genuine issue of material fact. Schnabel v. Trilegiant S, Corp., 697 F.3d 110, 113 (2d Cir. 2012). Where there are no disputed facts N regarding the matter of arbitrability, “a court may rule on the basis of that lega issue and avoid the need for further court proceedings.” Wachovia Bank., Nat'l Ass'n v. VCG Special Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd., 661 F.3d 164, 172 (2d Cir. 2011). As Defendants' motion to compel arbitration is not contested, I find that there are no genuinely disputed factual issues essential to the determination of the applicability of an arbitration provision. Id. The motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED, and the Clerc of Court is respectfully requested to close the open motion at Doc. 30.

SO ORDERED.

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the accompanying Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay this Action, Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc., by and through its undersigned counsel, will and hereby does move this Court, before the Honorable Vernon S. Broderick, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007, at such date and time as the Court shall designate, for an order, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, compelling this matter to arbitration and staying this action until arbitration is completed.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Local Civil Rule 6.1(b)(2) requires that any opposing affidavits and answering memoranda shall be served within fourteen (14) days after service of these moving papers.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s reply affidavits and memoranda of law shall be served and filed, in accordance with Local Civil Rule 6.1(b)(3), within seven (7) days after service of the answering papers.


Summaries of

Smith v. Experian Info. Sols.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 3, 2023
1:22-cv-06960-VSB (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Experian Info. Sols.

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW FREDERICK SMITH, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 3, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-06960-VSB (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2023)