Summary
upholding the constitutionality of the federal SORA
Summary of this case from Hickerson v. United StatesOpinion
No. 01-729.
April 28, 2003.
Petition for rehearing denied.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Smith v. Doe
U.S.
Apr 28, 2003
538 U.S. 1009 (2003)
Summaries of
Smith v. Doe
U.S.
Apr 28, 2003
538 U.S. 1009 (2003)
upholding the constitutionality of the federal SORA
Summary of this case from Hickerson v. United StatesIn Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1009 (2003), the Supreme Court upheld Alaska's sex registration statute against an as applied ex post facto challenge, finding that sex registration was regulatory not punitive.
Summary of this case from United States v. AusbyCase details for
Smith v. Doe
Case Details
Full title:SMITH ET AL. v. DOE ET AL., ante, p. 84
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 28, 2003
Citations
538 U.S. 1009 (2003)
Citing Cases
Hickerson v. United States
Mr. Hickerson makes an indeterminate ex post facto claim in his briefs to this court. There are indications…
United States v. AusbyGov't's Resp. at 1. In Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1009 (2003), the Supreme Court upheld Alaska's sex registration…