From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Daca Taxi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 1994
202 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 8, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.).


This action resulted from an automobile accident in which plaintiff's car was struck by defendants' taxicab. The only contested issue was damages. The record contains numerous irregularities related to the scheduling and conduct of the inquest. Defendants' counsel argues that the denial of his application for a brief adjournment was an abuse of discretion considering that defendants' counsel believed he was attending a conference rather than an inquest. The purpose of the adjournment was to secure the attendance of expert medical testimony. The proceeding was listed in the New York Law Journal as a conference.

In light of the award of $800,000 to plaintiff after his counsel had requested only $650,000, we hold that a new inquest is warranted (see, Balogh v. H.R.B. Caterers, 88 A.D.2d 136, 141; DiMauro v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth., 105 A.D.2d 236, 241).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Smith v. Daca Taxi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 1994
202 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Smith v. Daca Taxi, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HARRY SMITH, Respondent, v. DACA TAXI, INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 223

Citing Cases

Smith v. Daca Taxi, Inc.

" This Court unanimously vacated the award and remanded the matter for a new inquest noting, "The only…

Navarro v. A. Trenkman Estate, Inc.

We also find that plaintiff has adequately demonstrated the meritorious nature of his claims through a…