From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Crosby

U.S.
Dec 6, 2004
543 U.S. 1019 (2004)

Summary

finding that Plaintiff "has repeatedly abused this Court's process" and directing the Clerk "not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from [Plaintiff] unless the docketing fee. . .is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. . ."

Summary of this case from Smith v. Conner

Opinion

No. 04-6638.

December 6, 2004.


Certiorari Granted — Reversed. (See No. 03-1669, Ante, P. 77.)

C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari Dismissed

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

Smith v. Crosby

U.S.
Dec 6, 2004
543 U.S. 1019 (2004)

finding that Plaintiff "has repeatedly abused this Court's process" and directing the Clerk "not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from [Plaintiff] unless the docketing fee. . .is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. . ."

Summary of this case from Smith v. Conner
Case details for

Smith v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. CROSBY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 6, 2004

Citations

543 U.S. 1019 (2004)
125 S. Ct. 667

Citing Cases

Smith v. Warden, Hardee Corr. Inst.

See generally 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). In making that…

Smith v. Conner

Moreover, Plaintiff's argument that the state court orders barring him from filing cases in the Nineteenth…