From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bramhall

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 1, 1978
563 S.W.2d 238 (Tex. 1978)

Summary

making the same distinction between § 14.09(c) and a collateral claim for a debt

Summary of this case from Huff v. Huff

Opinion

No. B-7147.

March 1, 1978.

Appeal from the 40th District Court, Ellis County, Milton Hartsfield, J.

Clark Langford, Waxahachie, for petitioner.

Don R. Stout and Gene Knize, Waxahachie, for respondent.


The application for writ of error is denied with the notation, "Refused. No Reversible Error." Our action should not be interpreted as approving the conclusion of the Court of Civil Appeals that "unpaid child support is . . . a debt for which judgment may be taken." 556 S.W.2d 112, 113. Section 14.09(c) of the Texas Family Code provides only that unpaid child support may be reduced to judgment and enforced by the same means as a judgment for a debt, not that such sums are debts.


Summaries of

Smith v. Bramhall

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 1, 1978
563 S.W.2d 238 (Tex. 1978)

making the same distinction between § 14.09(c) and a collateral claim for a debt

Summary of this case from Huff v. Huff
Case details for

Smith v. Bramhall

Case Details

Full title:Gene SMITH, Trustee and Independent Executor, Petitioner, v. Mildred Ann…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Mar 1, 1978

Citations

563 S.W.2d 238 (Tex. 1978)

Citing Cases

Martin v. Adair

Under this section of the Probate Code only debts of the deceased can be paid from the assets of the estate.…

Huff v. Huff

In upholding the validity of the motion as an enforcement of the decree, the Court specifically indicated…