From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Borough of Barnegat Light

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 10, 1987
219 N.J. Super. 11 (App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

Argued June 9, 1987 —

Decided June 10, 1987.

Appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean County.

Before Judges KING, DEIGHAN and HAVEY.

Jerry J. Dasti, argued the cause for appellants ( Dasti Murphy, attorneys; Jerry J. Dasti on the brief).

Frank A. Buczynski, Jr., argued the cause for respondents ( Shackleton, Hazeltine and Buczynski, attorneys; Frank A. Buczynski on the letter brief).


This matter comes before us by way of appellants' motion for a stay pending appeal. By separate order we have denied that motion. We have accelerated the appeal for purposes of argument and disposition because it involves an election matter. See R. 1:2-5(1).

On our own motion we summarily affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Serpentelli in his written opinion of June 4, 1987, reported at 219 N.J. Super. 231 (Law Div. 1987). See R. 2:8-3(b).


Summaries of

Smith v. Borough of Barnegat Light

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 10, 1987
219 N.J. Super. 11 (App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Smith v. Borough of Barnegat Light

Case Details

Full title:ETHAN ALLEN SMITH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE BOROUGH OF…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jun 10, 1987

Citations

219 N.J. Super. 11 (App. Div. 1987)
529 A.2d 1000

Citing Cases

Shalita v. Township of Washington

These concerns were expressed prior to the enactment of the Open Public Meetings Act (N.J.S.A. 10:4-6 to -21)…

Patterson v. Cooper

However, the court will address defendants' contention that the City Council was unable to conduct important…