From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. 501 Washington, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 19, 1949
275 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

May 19, 1949.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.


Order reversed on the law and facts, with $10 costs and disbursements and motion denied, without costs, on the ground that the information plaintiff seeks is not shown to be material and necessary in the prosecution of this action. (Civ. Prac. Act. § 288.) The defendant may not be examined to ascertain the name of a prospective additional defendant.


The plaintiff is entitled to examine the defendant as to the identity of the elevator operator. ( Morris v. E.A. Laboratories, Inc., 263 App. Div. 540.) (The order grants an examination of defendant before trial in a negligence action.)


Summaries of

Smith v. 501 Washington, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 19, 1949
275 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Smith v. 501 Washington, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MABEL SMITH, Respondent, v. 501 WASHINGTON, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 19, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Matter of Kabes v. Young

The above-cited cases also sustain the propriety of the order authorizing the examination to ascertain the…