From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Township of Livingston

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 15, 1969
54 N.J. 525 (N.J. 1969)

Opinion

Argued October 7, 1969 —

Decided October 15, 1969.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, whose opinion is reported at 106 N.J. Super. 444.

Mr. Clive S. Cummis argued the cause for appellants, cross-respondents ( Messrs. Cummis, Kent Radin, attorneys; Mr. David S. Litwin on the brief).

Mr. Theodore L. Abeles argued the cause for defendants, cross-appellants ( Messrs. Lum, Biunno Tompkins, attorneys; Mr. William F. Tompkins, of counsel).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 106 N.J. Super. 444. The stay heretofore granted by the order of September 30, 1969, is vacated.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — NONE.


Summaries of

Smith v. Township of Livingston

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 15, 1969
54 N.J. 525 (N.J. 1969)
Case details for

Smith v. Township of Livingston

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE SMITH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 15, 1969

Citations

54 N.J. 525 (N.J. 1969)
257 A.2d 698

Citing Cases

Gumprecht v. City of Coeur D'Alene

See also, City of Scottsdale v. Superior Court, 103 Ariz. 204, 439 P.2d 290 (Ariz. 1968); Kelley v. John, 162…

City of Ocean City v. Somerville

Furthermore, N.J.S.A. 40:69A-184 "does not limit the power of initiative to only those areas of municipal…