From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smedley v. City of Ozark

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 16, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO 1:11cv954-MHT (M.D. Ala. Feb. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO 1:11cv954-MHT

02-16-2012

DARRELL SMEDLEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OZARK, Defendant.


(WO)


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) Plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 9) are overruled.

(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 6) is adopted.

(3) This lawsuit is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)and (ii).

(4) All pending motions are denied as moot.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smedley v. City of Ozark

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 16, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO 1:11cv954-MHT (M.D. Ala. Feb. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Smedley v. City of Ozark

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL SMEDLEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OZARK, Defendant.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 16, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO 1:11cv954-MHT (M.D. Ala. Feb. 16, 2012)

Citing Cases

Snow v. King

The court agrees with Judge King that, in Alabama, a municipal court is treated as an arm of the state…