From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smarr v. Colgrove

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 14, 1928
217 N.W. 775 (Mich. 1928)

Opinion

Docket No. 47.

Submitted January 27, 1928.

Decided February 14, 1928.

Error to Wayne; Dingeman (Harry J.), J. Submitted January 27, 1928. (Docket No. 47.) Decided February 14, 1928.

Assumpsit by Catherine C. Smarr against A.M. Colgrove upon promissory notes. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Joseph S. McDowell, for appellant.

Morris Garvett, for appellee.


This case was tried before the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. No request for findings of fact and of law was filed as required by Circuit Court Rule No. 45. No findings were filed. There is nothing before this court for review. Alexander Co. v. Griggs, 240 Mich. 71; Evangelist v. Falzerano, 241 Mich. 62; Wormley v. Grand Rapids Trust Co., 232 Mich. 680.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.

NORTH, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred.

Chief Justice FLANNIGAN and the late Justice BIRD took no part in this decision.


Summaries of

Smarr v. Colgrove

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 14, 1928
217 N.W. 775 (Mich. 1928)
Case details for

Smarr v. Colgrove

Case Details

Full title:SMARR v. COLGROVE

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Feb 14, 1928

Citations

217 N.W. 775 (Mich. 1928)
217 N.W. 775

Citing Cases

Sparzak v. Lachut

Defendant brings error. The case differs from Buitendorp v. Moore, 242 Mich. 51; Smarr v. Colgrove, 242 Mich.…

David v. Paul

No requests for finding of fact and law were presented to the court under Circuit Court Rule No. 45. No…