From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.M. v. J.K

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 27, 2001
315 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

Nos. 99-16184, 99-16960.

Argued and Submitted May 14, 2001.

Filed August 27, 2001. Amended January 14, 2003.

Gary M. Levitt, David C. Schutter Associates, Honolulu, HI, for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.

Richard E. Wilson, Simons Ichinose, Honolulu, HI, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.

Arthur B. Reinwald, Dennis E.W. O'Connor, Michael J. McGuigan, and Jason M. Tani, Reinwald, O'Connor Marrack, Honolulu, HI, for the defendant-appellant-cross-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i; Francis I. Yamashita, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV 94-00181-FIY.

Before: B. FLETCHER, CANBY, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.



ORDER

The Court sua sponte recalls the mandate issued on October 23, 2001.

The opinion filed August 27, 2001, is hereby amended by deleting the following sentence from footnote 7: "We decline to adopt the [ United States v.] Scholl, [ 959 F.Supp. 1189 (D.Ariz. 1997)] district court's reasoning now, as it is contrary to Daubert's [v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993)] standard for admissibility."

The Court directs the Clerk to reissue the mandate forthwith.


Summaries of

S.M. v. J.K

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 27, 2001
315 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

S.M. v. J.K

Case Details

Full title:S.M., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. J.K.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 27, 2001

Citations

315 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

Winfred D. v. Michelin North America, Inc.

Both were deposed by Michelin and questioned about their relationship with Winfred, subjecting them to…

United States v. Nosal

In S.M. v. J.K., the Ninth Circuit held that the district court did not err in excluding evidence of a sexual…