From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sloss v. Farmers Bank Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 26, 1987
290 Ark. 304 (Ark. 1987)

Opinion


722 S.W.2d 598 (Ark. 1987) 290 Ark. 304 Helen Elizabeth SLOSS, et al. v. FARMERS BANKs&sTRUST CO., Administrator In Succession. No. 86-83. Supreme Court of Arkansas. January 26, 1987.

        Appeal from Mississippi Probate Court, Mississippi County.

        Prior report: 290 Ark. 304, 719 S.W.2d 273.

        [290 Ark. 311-A] PER CURIAM.

        In our original decision of November 10, 1986, we reduced the fee allowed by the probate judge to the appellee for services as administrator. The appellee mailed a petition for rehearing which was filed in our clerk's office on Monday, December 1, 1986. We denied the petition as being untimely because it was filed more than seventeen calendar days after our decision was rendered and was thus in violation of Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 20(a).

        Counsel for the appellee contends he had until December 1, 1986, to file the petition for rehearing. He contends Ark.R.App.P. 9 allows extension to the next business day when the seventeenth[290 Ark. 311-B] day falls on a legal holiday. He also contends our clerk informed him that the next business day after November 27, Thanksgiving Day, would be Monday, December 1, 1986, because the governor had proclaimed that state offices would be closed on Friday, November 28, 1986.

        Rather than decide whether Ark.R.App.P. 9 is controlling over the more specific provision of our rule 20(a) and the effect of the governor's proclamation, which was presumably made pursuant to Ark.Stat.Ann. § 69-112.1 (Repl.1979), we have reviewed the appellee's petition for rehearing on its merits and concluded that it must be denied, whether or not it was timely.

        We have concluded that our rules 20(a) and 29 subsection 6. should be revised to remove the strict seventeen calendar day requirement for filing petitions for review and rehearing so that Ark.R.App.P. 9 will apply to the time limits on those petitions. We make those changes this date in a separate per curiam order.

        GLAZE, J., concurs and would permit petition for rehearing to be filed on basis of clerk's office calculated and designated time extended past regular seventeen day period.


Summaries of

Sloss v. Farmers Bank Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 26, 1987
290 Ark. 304 (Ark. 1987)
Case details for

Sloss v. Farmers Bank Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:Helen Elizabeth SLOSS et al. v. FARMERS BANK AND TRUST CO

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 26, 1987

Citations

290 Ark. 304 (Ark. 1987)
290 Ark. 304
719 S.W.2d 273

Citing Cases

U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Hill

Disqualification is a matter left largely to the discretion of the individual judge. Sloss v. Farmers Bank …

Roe v. Dietrich

The decision to disqualify from a case is, again, discretionary with the trial court. See Sloss v. Farmers…