From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sloan v. Shannon

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Eastern Division
Apr 29, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:07CV245-SA-JAD (N.D. Miss. Apr. 29, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:07CV245-SA-JAD.

April 29, 2009


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


Pursuant to an opinion issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [48] and Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment [60] is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for Title VII retaliation as it relates to Plaintiff's transfer to Tupelo High School, First Amendment retaliation, tortious interference with employment as it relates to Plaintiff's transfer to Tupelo High School, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
(2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [48] and Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment [60] is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claims for sexual harassment, Title VII retaliation as it relates to Plaintiff's cut in hours, violation of equal protection, and tortious interference with employment as it relates to Plaintiff's cut in hours.
SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sloan v. Shannon

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Eastern Division
Apr 29, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:07CV245-SA-JAD (N.D. Miss. Apr. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Sloan v. Shannon

Case Details

Full title:TARA NICOLE SLOAN PLAINTIFF v. CRAIG SHANNON AND TUPELO PUBLIC SCHOOL…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 29, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:07CV245-SA-JAD (N.D. Miss. Apr. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

King v. Lawrence Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

However, Plaintiff did not assert a "class-of-one" equal protection theory. Plaintiff claims to be a member…