From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slezak v. Glover

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 3, 2009
326 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-8167.

Submitted: May 28, 2009.

Decided: June 3, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:06-cv-01122-RBH).

Gary Slezak, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Paul Woodington, Davidson Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Gary Slezak appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Slezak v. Glover, No. 4:06-cv-01122-RBH, 2008 WL 4308144 (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Slezak v. Glover

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 3, 2009
326 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Slezak v. Glover

Case Details

Full title:Gary SLEZAK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel B. GLOVER, Director of South…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 3, 2009

Citations

326 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2009)