From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slavin v. Francis H. Leggett Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1936
186 A. 832 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Argued February 4, 1936 —

Decided May 14, 1936.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 114 N.J.L. 421.

For the respondent, Manuel Weiner.

For the appellant, Edwards, Smith Dawson.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 7.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HEHER, WELLS, JJ. 3.


Summaries of

Slavin v. Francis H. Leggett Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1936
186 A. 832 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Slavin v. Francis H. Leggett Co.

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL SLAVIN, RESPONDENT, v. FRANCIS H. LEGGETT COMPANY, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 14, 1936

Citations

186 A. 832 (N.J. 1936)
186 A. 832

Citing Cases

O'Donnell v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

We then examine the transcript in search of the presence of some evidence that this defendant was negligent…

O'Donnell v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

Nor has this liability been limited to manufacturers. In Slavin v. Francis H. Leggett Co., 114 N.J.L. 421 (…