From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slaughter v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, DIVISION ONE
Aug 17, 1999
997 S.W.2d 132 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 22685

August 17, 1999

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF TEXAS COUNTY, HON. DOUGLAS E. LONG.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Appellant Director of Revenue.

No brief filed by Respondent.


Following Plaintiff's arrest for driving while intoxicated, his driver's license was revoked for refusing to take a breath test. Thereafter he sought judicial review under Section 577.041, RSMo Supp. 1997. When Defendant did not file an answer within the time ordinarily allowed, a default judgment was entered requiring that Defendant reinstate Plaintiff's driver's license. Defendant appeals.

Respondent has not filed a brief. "While there is no penalty prescribed for the failure to file a brief, we are required to decide the case without the benefit of that party's authorities and points of view." Fitzgerald v. Director of Revenue, 922 S.W.2d 478, 479 n. 3 (Mo.App. 1996).

Judicial review under Section 577.041 does not require the Director of Revenue to file an answer or other responsive pleadings. Nguyen v. Director of Revenue, 900 S.W.2d 238, 239 (Mo.App. 1995); Gothard v. Spradling, 586 S.W.2d 443, 446 (Mo.App. 1979). See also Dudley v. Director of Revenue, 926 S.W.2d 943, 944 (Mo.App. 1996); Daus v. Director of Revenue, 840 S.W.2d 892, 893 (Mo.App. 1992).

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. Garrison, C.J., and Montgomery, P.J., concur.


Summaries of

Slaughter v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, DIVISION ONE
Aug 17, 1999
997 S.W.2d 132 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Slaughter v. Director of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ROCKY DIXON SLAUGHTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Aug 17, 1999

Citations

997 S.W.2d 132 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Dir. of Revenue v. Carter

Relator contends Respondent was acting in excess of his jurisdiction by compelling her to engage in discovery…

State ex rel. Dir. of Revenue v. Carter

Relator specifically argues, "This Court has long recognized that it is the provisions of Chapter 536, RSMO,…