From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skolnick v. Fumo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 1941
261 App. Div. 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

March 31, 1941.


Order denying appellants' motion, under section 1493, Civil Practice Act, for a transcript of the stenographer's minutes, reversed on the facts, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs. On the facts appearing in the papers on appeal, which are undisputed, it appears that a prima facie case was established and that the complaint should not have been dismissed. A reading of the transcript of the whole evidence may disclose a contrary conclusion, but on the present papers we believe the motion should have been granted. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Skolnick v. Fumo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 1941
261 App. Div. 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Skolnick v. Fumo

Case Details

Full title:BECKY SKOLNICK and SAMUEL SKOLNICK, Appellants, v. JOHN J. FUMO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1941

Citations

261 App. Div. 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Citing Cases

Rayano v. City of New York

Present — MacCrate, Acting P.J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. Motion for leave to appeal as a…