Summary
In Skladzien v. Board of Education of the City ofBayonne, 12 N.J. Mis. R. 602; 173 Atl. Rep. 600, this court held that, in virtue of this provision, "a new board comes into being each year," and that there is vested in each succeeding board the "prerogative of appointing a medical inspector of its own selection."
Summary of this case from Bd. Education, Cedar Grove v. State Bd. EducationOpinion
Argued February 8, 1935 —
Decided May 17, 1935.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 12 N.J. Mis. R. 602.
For the appellant, Charles Rubenstein.
For the respondents, Alfred Brenner.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 8.
For reversal — DONGES, PERSKIE, KAYS, WELLS, JJ. 4.