From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skinner v. Schwab

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1919
188 App. Div. 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Opinion

June 13, 1919.

John L. Wells of counsel [ Collin, Wells Hughes, attorneys], for the appellant.

Samuel S. Koenig of counsel [ Koenig, Goldsmith Sittenfield, attorneys], for the respondent.


This is a separate appeal by the defendant George T. Rogers from a judgment rendered against him and others for amounts equal to the par value of stock held by them in the Carnegie Trust Company. The points raised are disposed of in the opinion in Skinner v. Schwab ( 188 App. Div. 457), handed down herewith.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

CLARKE, P.J., DOWLING, SMITH and PAGE, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Skinner v. Schwab

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1919
188 App. Div. 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
Case details for

Skinner v. Schwab

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE I. SKINNER, as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1919

Citations

188 App. Div. 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
177 N.Y.S. 152

Citing Cases

Skinner v. Schwab

The general points will be considered first. The appellant George T. Rogers, who refrained from joining in…