From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skinner v. Boyd

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 27, 1926
134 A. 919 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided October 27th, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 98 N.J. Eq. 55. On appeal of Deborah Price and others.

Mr. Richard Boardman, for the appellant.

Messrs Heine, Bradner Laird and Messrs. Congleton, Stallman Hoover, for the respondents.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Skinner v. Boyd

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 27, 1926
134 A. 919 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Skinner v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:RALPH W. SKINNER, subtrustee, c., complainant, v. JANE H. BOYD et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 27, 1926

Citations

134 A. 919 (N.J. 1926)
134 A. 919

Citing Cases

Pierson v. Jones

More than a century ago it was announced by Lord Chancellor Eldon in Sibley v. Perry, 7 Vesey, 522 (1802),…

Pierson v. Jones

More than a century ago it was announced by Lord Chancellor Eldon in Sibley v. Perry ( 1802), 7 Ves. 522, and…