From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skier v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 2001
289 A.D.2d 474 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2001-01960

Submitted November 26, 2001.

December 24, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), entered December 28, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

Fuchsberg Fuchsberg, New York, N.Y. (Ronald Yang of counsel), for appellants.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Edward F. X. Hart and Jane L. Gordon of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, STEPHEN G. CRANE, A. GAIL PRUDENTI, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendant City of New York after the plaintiff Rose Skier was allegedly injured when she tripped and fell while in a city park in Queens. At trial, the injured plaintiff testified that she was descending what she believed to be a staircase, comprised of soil and grass steps bound at the edge by wooden timbers, when she tripped on a wooden timber after her toe became stuck in a depression in the dirt "step".

The plaintiffs failed to present evidence that the City either created the alleged defect at issue, or had actual or constructive notice of the alleged defect for a reasonable time prior to the accident in order to remedy the defect (see, Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp., 84 N.Y.2d 967). Thus, the jury verdict in favor of the defendant was proper.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiffs' contentions concerning alleged errors in the jury charge (see, J.R. Loftus, Inc. v. White, 85 N.Y.2d 874, 876; see also, Mercy Community Hosp. v. Cannon Design, 235 A.D.2d 405).

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, CRANE and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Skier v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 2001
289 A.D.2d 474 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Skier v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ROSE SKIER, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 24, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 474 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 584

Citing Cases

Cahill v. Tribor. Bridge

The court erred, however, in remanding the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim for a new trial based on a jury charge…