From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sivilay v. Apfel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 23, 1998
143 F.3d 1298 (9th Cir. 1998)

Summary

remanding to ALJ to "investigate fully the demands of the applicant's past work and compare them to the applicant's residual mental and physical capabilities"

Summary of this case from Ware v. Astrue

Opinion

No. 97-16312.

Argued April 13, 1998.

Decided June 23, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Peter A. Nowins, Magistrate-Judge, Presiding D.C. No. CV-96-01335-PAN.

John V. Johnson, Chico, California, for plaintiff-appellant.

John C. Cusker, Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee.

Before: FLETCHER, NELSON, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.



ORDER

We vacate the findings of the administrative law judge for the misapplication of Social Security Rulings 82-61 and 82-62. See Henrie v. U.S. Department of Health Human Services, 13 F.3d 359, 360-61 (10th Cir. 1993). On remand, we direct the administrative law judge to investigate fully the demands of the applicant's past work and compare them to the applicant's residual mental and physical capabilities.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Sivilay v. Apfel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 23, 1998
143 F.3d 1298 (9th Cir. 1998)

remanding to ALJ to "investigate fully the demands of the applicant's past work and compare them to the applicant's residual mental and physical capabilities"

Summary of this case from Ware v. Astrue

remanding to ALJ to "investigate fully the demands of the applicant's past work and compare them to the applicant's residual mental and physical capabilities"

Summary of this case from Chadwell v. Astrue

remanding to ALJ to "investigate fully the demands of the applicant's past work and compare them to the applicant's residual mental and physical capabilities"

Summary of this case from Parker v. Astrue

remanding to ALJ to "investigate fully the demands of the applicant's past work and compare them to the applicant's residual mental and physical capabilities"

Summary of this case from Montgomery v. Astrue

remanding to ALJ to "investigate fully the demands of the applicant's past work and compare them to the applicant's residual mental and physical capabilities"

Summary of this case from Andrews v. Astrue

remanding to ALJ to "investigate fully the demands of the applicant's past work and compare them to the applicant's residual mental and physical capabilities"

Summary of this case from Garcia v. Astrue
Case details for

Sivilay v. Apfel

Case Details

Full title:Ngeunh SIVILAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 23, 1998

Citations

143 F.3d 1298 (9th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

Ware v. Astrue

" Id.. As a result, "[d]etailed information about . . . mental demands and other job requirements must be…

Speruggia v. Astrue

Kerulo v. Apfel, No. 98-CV-7315 (MBM), 1999 WL 813350, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 1999) (emphasis added). See…