From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sinclair Refining Co. v. the Morania Dolphin

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 11, 1959
272 F.2d 192 (2d Cir. 1959)

Opinion

No. 74, Docket 25582.

Argued November 20, 1959.

Decided December 11, 1959.

Cross-appeals from an interlocutory decree of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in Admiralty; Edward Weinfeld, Judge.

The S.S.P.W. Thirtle and the M/V Morania Dolphin were approaching the B. O. Bridge at Elizabethport Reach in the Kill Van Kull, when the M/V Morania Dolphin passed the P.W. Thirtle to starboard and cut across her bow as the two vessels came to a 40° turn to port in the channel. For the damage to the Bethlehem pier, caused by the impact of the S.S.P.W. Thirtle against the pier the trial judge found both vessels to blame and these cross-appeals followed. Opinion below reported at 170 F. Supp. 586.

Stanley R. Wright, New York City (H. Barton Williams and Burlingham, Hupper Kennedy, New York City, on the brief), for Sinclair Refining Co., libellant-appellee, cross-appellant.

C. John Dirosse, New York City, for claimants-respondents-appellants-cross-appellees.

Before MEDINA, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.


We find it unnecessary to supplement what is said in Judge Weinfeld's excellent opinion on the subject of the fault of the Thirtle. We affirm the decree against the Dolphin on the ground of her statutory fault in passing the Thirtle despite the fact that she received no response to her signal for permission to pass. We agree with Judge Weinfeld that the Dolphin has not sustained the heavy burden of proving that this statutory violation "could not have contributed to the occurrence." The Pennsylvania, 1873, 86 U.S. 125, 136, 22 L. Ed. 148; Great Lakes Dredge Dock Co. v. The Santiago, 2 Cir., 1946, 155 F.2d 148, 150, note 7.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Sinclair Refining Co. v. the Morania Dolphin

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 11, 1959
272 F.2d 192 (2d Cir. 1959)
Case details for

Sinclair Refining Co. v. the Morania Dolphin

Case Details

Full title:SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, as charterer in possession of THE P.W. THIRTLE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 11, 1959

Citations

272 F.2d 192 (2d Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

Tug Ocean Queen, Inc. v. Tanker Four Lakes

Therefore, the tug's sounding of the two blasts could not have contributed to the pilot's decision to…

Oil Transfer Corporation v. Atlantic Tankers, Ltd.

Under the rule of The Pennsylvania, 1873, 19 Wall. 125, 86 U.S. 125, 22 L.Ed. 148, a vessel guilty of a…