From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sinclair Co. v. Pitts Hauling Co.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Jan 18, 1960
21 Misc. 2d 959 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)

Opinion

January 18, 1960

Hamilton Freeman for Bero Construction Corp. and another, defendants.

Marvin M. Notkins for plaintiff.


Defendants Bero Construction Corp. and American Surety Company of New York move for dismissal of the complaint, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 and subdivision 7 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

Plaintiff had supplied petroleum products to the defendant S.J. Pitts Hauling Co., Inc., and in a first cause of action seeks the recovery of the unpaid balance of the purchase price. That defendant was a subcontractor of the defendant Bero. In a second cause of action, plaintiff seeks to recover the unpaid purchase price from the latter, on the basis of a claimed guarantee. The bond furnished in connection with the public improvement was furnished by the defendant Surety Company, and in a third cause of action the plaintiff seeks to recover the purchase price from that defendant.

With respect to the claimed guarantee, plaintiff alleges that the defendant Bero guaranteed to plaintiff that the latter would be paid by Bero for material furnished and to be furnished to the subcontractor in order to induce the plaintiff to make further deliveries to the subcontractor. Thus, plaintiff is entitled to maintain the second cause of action upon the basis of the promise made by the defendant Bero, as an independent promise to make payment to the plaintiff, irrespective of the liability of the principal debtor ( Bulkley v. Shaw, 289 N.Y. 133, 136).

A copy of the bond is attached to the complaint and made a part of the third cause thereof. It is a statutory bond given in compliance with section 137 State Fin. of the State Finance Law. The filing of a lien is necessary to secure the rights and benefits conferred by the statute. The complaint fails to allege that such a lien has been filed.

The motion is granted dismissing the cause of action asserted against the defendant American Surety Company of New York, and is otherwise denied, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint with 20 days from service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.


Summaries of

Sinclair Co. v. Pitts Hauling Co.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Jan 18, 1960
21 Misc. 2d 959 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)
Case details for

Sinclair Co. v. Pitts Hauling Co.

Case Details

Full title:SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. S.J. PITTS HAULING CO., INC., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Jan 18, 1960

Citations

21 Misc. 2d 959 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)
198 N.Y.S.2d 606

Citing Cases

Scott v. Kyhl

As put by the appellants, "* * * if an instrument, purporting by its terms to be a `guaranty' was in reality,…

Ciavarella v. People

4 N.Y.2d 892). No appeal was taken from the order filed therein and, in a letter to this court dated…