From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sims v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 10, 1999
746 So. 2d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-04381.

Opinion filed December 10, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Douglas S. Connor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Sr. Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Katina Irene Sims appeals the sentences and order of restitution imposed after she entered a plea of no contest to numerous drug offenses. The sentences are affirmed; however, the trial court erred when it ordered Sims to pay $1,022.31 in restitution to the State of Florida for the supervision costs of her unsuccessful probation and community control. The State does not qualify as a victim for payment of restitution pursuant to section 775.089(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1997). See Rodriguez v. State, 691 So.2d 568, 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Accordingly, we direct the trial court to strike the order of restitution.

Further, the record before this court does not contain an order of revocation of probation specifying which conditions of probation were violated. Although we affirm the revocation of Sims' probation, we must remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying the conditions violated. See Watson v. State, 718 So.2d 253, 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part with directions.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Sims v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 10, 1999
746 So. 2d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Sims v. State

Case Details

Full title:KATINA IRENE SIMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 10, 1999

Citations

746 So. 2d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Childers v. State

Indeed, legislative intent to include counties within the term "person" when the term is used to refer to a…

Jones v. State

However, because Jones agreed to pay $50 in investigative costs to the sheriff's office as part of his…