From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simpson v. Valve Foundry Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 6, 1932
245 N.W. 803 (Mich. 1932)

Opinion

Docket No. 171, Calendar No. 36,667.

Submitted October 28, 1932.

Decided December 6, 1932.

Appeal from Department of Labor and Industry. Submitted October 28, 1932. (Docket No. 171, Calendar No. 36,667.) Decided December 6, 1932.

Elizabeth Simpson, guardian of John Simpson, a mental incompetent, presented a claim against Michigan Valve Foundry Company, employer, and Michigan Mutual Liability Company, insurer, for an accidental injury to her ward while in defendant's employ. Award to plaintiff. Defendants appeal. Affirmed.

John W. Babcock, for plaintiff.

L.J. Carey ( R.B. Hart, of counsel), for defendants.


This is review upon certiorari of an award of the department of labor and industry in favor of plaintiff, guardian of John Simpson, mentally incompetent.

Simpson was an operator of a boring machine in the plant of defendant employer. He was observed "standing in front of the machine operating it the way he was supposed to operate it." Soon thereafter he was found lying on top of the machine, unconscious, suffering from a fractured skull. No one saw the accident. Simpson, being mentally incompetent, was not a witness at the hearing. The department in making findings might draw all rational and natural inferences from the facts and circumstances shown. Under the authority of Papinaw, v. Railway Co., 189 Mich. 441 (12 N.C.C.A. 243); Meyers v. Railroad Co., 199 Mich. 134; and Wishcaless v. Hammond, Standish Co., 201 Mich. 192, the department might find, as it did, that the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment. A further defense attempted is that the accident was due to intentional and wilful misconduct of Simpson. If it be conceded that an inference might have been drawn from the facts and circumstance that the accident was so occasioned, it appears that the department declined to draw it and found to the contrary, as it might under the evidence. This was within its province, and the finding is conclusive on this court.

Affirmed.

McDONALD, POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, FEAD, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Simpson v. Valve Foundry Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 6, 1932
245 N.W. 803 (Mich. 1932)
Case details for

Simpson v. Valve Foundry Co.

Case Details

Full title:SIMPSON v. MICHIGAN VALVE FOUNDRY CO

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 6, 1932

Citations

245 N.W. 803 (Mich. 1932)
245 N.W. 803

Citing Cases

Rogers v. Ford Motor Co.

We have frequently held that a finding that an accident occurred may be a reasonable and natural inference…

Johns v. Land Lumber Co.

Section 8424 does not set aside such actions. The department may draw inferences from the facts and…