From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simpson v. Berry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-cv-112-CWR-FKB (S.D. Miss. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-cv-112-CWR-FKB

03-18-2013

JAMES LEE SIMPSON PLAINTIFF v. WILLIAM BERRY and RONALD EASLEY DEFENDANTS


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball, entered on February 19, 2013, and which clearly notified the respective parties in the above-styled and numbered cause that failure to file written objections to the findings and recommendations contained within fourteen (14) days from the date of filing would bar further appeal in accordance with Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. Rule Civ. P. 72(b)(2), and this Court, finding that there has been no submission of written objections by any party, hereby adopts said Report and Recommendation as the order of this Court.

Carlton W. Reeves

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Simpson v. Berry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-cv-112-CWR-FKB (S.D. Miss. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Simpson v. Berry

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LEE SIMPSON PLAINTIFF v. WILLIAM BERRY and RONALD EASLEY DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-cv-112-CWR-FKB (S.D. Miss. Mar. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

Simpson v. Mississippi

The Court notes that prior to filing this habeas petition, on June 25, 2010, Simpson filed a civil rights…

San Leandro Canning Company, Inc. v. Perillo

When such fact exists there is authority for the contention that no duty rests on the owner of property to…