From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simoneaux v. Sun Erection Company

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Sep 16, 1988
531 So. 2d 1136 (La. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 88-CA-0139.

September 16, 1988.

APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE THOMAS A. EARLY, JR., J.

Darleen M. Jacobs, Brian Beckwith, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

James L. Donovan, Kevin K. Gipson, Donovan Lawler, Metairie, for intervenor Associated and Indem. Corp.

Charles L. Chassaignac, Carmelite M. Bertaut, Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Toler Sarpy, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee Standard Roofing Co. of New Orleans, Inc.

Before BARRY, CIACCIO and WARD, JJ.


Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendants. A procedural complication, however, prevents us from considering the merits of plaintiff's appeal. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal, without prejudice, and remand the matter to the district court.

Plaintiff filed this action in 1980. Defendants filed motions for summary judgment, but before a hearing was held plaintiff died. Apparently unaware of plaintiff's death, counsel and the court conducted a hearing, and on February 2, 1987, the district court rendered judgment against plaintiff. On February 17, 1987, plaintiff's counsel filed a motion for appeal, which the court granted on March 10, 1987. On March 4, 1987, however, plaintiff's counsel had filed a supplemental and amending petition to substitute plaintiff's wife and son as parties plaintiff. And on March 6, 1987, the court had ordered the supplemental and amending petition filed.

Despite the later substitution of parties plaintiff, the judgment appealed is against a plaintiff who was dead when the judgment was rendered. Although the proceedings in the district court were valid up to the moment of plaintiff's death, at that instant the action abated as to him, and the substitution of parties plaintiff did not cure the nullity. For it is well settled that a judgment for or against a deceased person is an absolute nullity. Navarro v. Derbes, 211 La. 384, 30 So.2d 126 (1947); White v. Givens, 491 So.2d 63 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1986); Smith v. Burden Construction Company, 379 So.2d 1133 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1979); Gulfco Finance of Livingston, Inc. v. Lee, 224 So.2d 524 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1969); Fountain v. American Employers Insurance Company, 161 So.2d 120 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1964); Hughes v. Furlow, 83 So.2d 144 (La.App. Orleans 1955), writ denied 1956. Any interested party may have declared null a judgment against a deceased person. Sanders Son v. Schilling, 123 La. 1009, 49 So. 689 (1909); Hughes v. Furlow, above. An appeal from such a judgment is improvidently granted and without effect. Navarro v. Derbes, above.

Because the judgment appealed is an absolute nullity, we dismiss the appeal, without prejudice. We remand this matter to the district court for further proceedings with proper parties substituted for the deceased plaintiff.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Simoneaux v. Sun Erection Company

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Sep 16, 1988
531 So. 2d 1136 (La. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Simoneaux v. Sun Erection Company

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON SIMONEAUX, III v. SUN ERECTION COMPANY, ET AL

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 16, 1988

Citations

531 So. 2d 1136 (La. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Tiger Leasing, Inc. v. Johnson

Homeco's appeal urges that it was a holder in due course and, alternatively, that there was no evidence to…