From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Sam's East, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 2002
293 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-06903

Argued March 1, 2002.

April 15, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Sam's East, Inc., d/b/a Sam's Club and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), entered July 3, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Brody, O'Connor O'Connor, Northport, N.Y. (Patricia A. O'Connor, Thomas M. O'Connor, and Scott Brody of counsel), for appellants.

James J. Killerlane, White Plains, N.Y. (Thomas Iannuccilli of counsel), for respondents.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

There is no duty on the part of a landowner to warn against a condition that is readily observable by those employing the reasonable use of their senses (see Hughey v. Wal-Mart, 275 A.D.2d 441; Cherry v. Hofstra, 274 A.D.2d 443; Meyer v. Tyner, 273 A.D.2d 364; Paulo v. Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co., 233 A.D.2d 380).

The appellants established a prima facie case that the concrete barrier over which the injured plaintiff fell was clearly visible (see Dominitz v. Food Emporium, 271 A.D.2d 640; Plessias v. Scalia Home for Funerals, 271 A.D.2d 423). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court erred in denying the appellants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

S. MILLER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Simmons v. Sam's East, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 2002
293 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Simmons v. Sam's East, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SIMMONS, ET AL., respondents, v. SAM'S EAST, INC., d/b/a SAM'S CLUB…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 15, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 218

Citing Cases

Schindler v. Filene's Basement, Inc.

The respondent, Filene's Basement, Inc., made out a prima facie case establishing its entitlement to summary…

Jang Hee Lee v. Sung Whun Oh

The scope of the duty varies with the forseeability of the potential harm ( see Tagle v. Jakob, 97 N.Y.2d…