From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Nov 16, 2007
Civil No. 3:05-CV-1921-K (BH) (N.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2007)

Summary

finding that "isolated incidents and offhand comments" do not support a hostile work environment claim

Summary of this case from ORDOGNE v. AAA TEXAS, LLC

Opinion

Civil No. 3:05-CV-1921-K (BH).

November 16, 2007


ORDER


After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and are adopted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's Title VII claims of racial discrimination, racial harassment, and hostile work environment are dismissed, with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Simmons v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Nov 16, 2007
Civil No. 3:05-CV-1921-K (BH) (N.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2007)

finding that "isolated incidents and offhand comments" do not support a hostile work environment claim

Summary of this case from ORDOGNE v. AAA TEXAS, LLC

noting that differential management, unwarranted job performance scrutiny, performance requirement standards, and ignoring complaints of disparate treatment were not adverse employment actions

Summary of this case from Jones v. Dall. Cnty.

noting that differential management, unwarranted job performance scrutiny, performance requirement standards, and ignoring complaints of disparate treatment are not adverse employment actions

Summary of this case from Levine v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas
Case details for

Simmons v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE SIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Nov 16, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 3:05-CV-1921-K (BH) (N.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2007)

Citing Cases

ORDOGNE v. AAA TEXAS, LLC

Such infrequent occurrences over a nine-month period do not support a hostile workplace claim. See Hockman v.…

McCullar v. Methodist Hosp. of Dallas

This Court has previously held that interference with an employee's ability to earn bonuses does not amount…