From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sima v. Sima

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 6, 1976
337 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 76-1239.

October 6, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, John S. Andrews, J.

J.E. Satterfield of The Legal Aid Society, Clearwater, for appellant.

Sondra Goldenfarb, Joseph G. Donahey, Jr., Clearwater, for appellee.


Pursuant to the authority of Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26, Fla.App.2d 1975, a trial court has jurisdiction to hear evidence and decide whether a modification of rehabilitative alimony should be granted or, if the circumstances warrant, a complete revisitation of the alimony question.

Therefore, the trial court erred in holding that it was limited in its jurisdiction to only extending the rehabilitative alimony.

Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing in accordance with this opinion.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sima v. Sima

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 6, 1976
337 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Sima v. Sima

Case Details

Full title:MARY ELIZABETH SIMA, APPELLANT, v. CELESTINE RAYMOND SIMA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 6, 1976

Citations

337 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Pujals v. Pujals

We reverse the order below on the sole ground that, by virtue of its inherent as well as statutory authority…

McLauchlin v. McLauchlin

In the event that the wife is unable to find suitable employment within the allotted time, she may seek…