From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silverman v. Mendiburu

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 22, 2019
No. 18-16476 (9th Cir. Nov. 22, 2019)

Summary

applying principle that verified complaint and opposition papers are competent evidence to be considered in ruling on defendants' motion for summary judgment

Summary of this case from Sullivan v. United States

Opinion

No. 18-16476

11-22-2019

JACOB SILVERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MENDIBURU, Corporal; et al., Defendants-Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 5:17-cv-01146-BLF MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Jacob Silverman, a former California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We vacate and remand.

The district court determined that Silverman failed to submit competent evidence, such as a declaration or affidavit, sufficient to establish a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants used excessive force. However, Silverman filed a verified complaint and opposition papers, including a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury. The district court should have considered these filings as competent evidence in ruling on defendants' motion for summary judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1746 (providing that a written unsworn declaration or statement subscribed as true under penalty of perjury may substitute for an affidavit); Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1090 n.1 (9th Cir. 1996) ("[A] verified complaint may be treated as an affidavit to oppose summary judgment[.]").

We vacate and remand for further proceedings on Silverman's excessive force claim. We do not consider in the first instance whether defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Silverman v. Mendiburu

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 22, 2019
No. 18-16476 (9th Cir. Nov. 22, 2019)

applying principle that verified complaint and opposition papers are competent evidence to be considered in ruling on defendants' motion for summary judgment

Summary of this case from Sullivan v. United States
Case details for

Silverman v. Mendiburu

Case Details

Full title:JACOB SILVERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MENDIBURU, Corporal; et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 22, 2019

Citations

No. 18-16476 (9th Cir. Nov. 22, 2019)

Citing Cases

William Young v. The Allstate Co.

Only sworn affidavits - or unsworn declarations that are, inter alia, subscribed under penalty of perjury,…

Sullivan v. United States

(Doc. 2.) See Silverman v. Mendiburu, 785 Fed. App'x 460 (Nov. 22, 2019) (mem. decision) (applying principle…