From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silverball Amusement v. Utah Home Fire Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 21, 1994
33 F.3d 1476 (8th Cir. 1994)

Summary

permitting coverage for alleged negligent hiring and supervision by an insured despite molestation by another insured

Summary of this case from Doe v. Shaffer

Opinion

No. 94-1550.

Submitted September 12, 1994.

Decided September 21, 1994.

John W. Anderson, Tulsa, OK, for appellant.

Gregory Smith, Fort Smith, AR, for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, William Wilson, U.S.D.C., Judge.

Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.


This declaratory judgment action concerns an insurance coverage dispute between Utah Home Fire Insurance Company (Utah Home) and its insured, Silverball Amusement, Inc. (Silverball). Utah Home Appeals the ruling of the district court. Silverball Amusement, Inc. v. Utah Home Fire Ins. Co., 842 F. Supp. 1151 (W.D.Ark. 1994). Having carefully reviewed the case and having considered de novo the disputed issues of Arkansas law, we conclude that Utah Home has an obligation to defend and indemnify its insured in a lawsuit brought against Silverball by Sandra J. Cole as guardian, custodial parent, and next friend of Jessica Dawn Cole, a minor. The district court thoroughly addressed the issues in a well-reasoned opinion, and we agree with the district court's conclusions. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir.R. 47B.


Summaries of

Silverball Amusement v. Utah Home Fire Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 21, 1994
33 F.3d 1476 (8th Cir. 1994)

permitting coverage for alleged negligent hiring and supervision by an insured despite molestation by another insured

Summary of this case from Doe v. Shaffer

permitting coverage for alleged negligent hiring and supervision by an insured despite molestation by another insured

Summary of this case from GNFH, Inc. v. W. Am. Ins. Co.

In Silverball, the federal court, applying Arkansas law, held that, because of the Separation of Insureds provision, the negligent hiring and supervision claims asserted against the insured employer should be considered separately from the tort claims (intentional molesting of a child) asserted against the employee.

Summary of this case from King v. Dallas Fire Ins. Co.
Case details for

Silverball Amusement v. Utah Home Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SILVERBALL AMUSEMENT, INC., APPELLEE, v. UTAH HOME FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 21, 1994

Citations

33 F.3d 1476 (8th Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Safeco Ins. Co. v. White

As we stated, "the intentions of the molester are immaterial to determining whether the allegedly negligent…

King v. Dallas Fire Ins. Co.

See also American Guar. Liab. Ins. Co. v. 1906 Co., 129 F.3d 802, 810 (5th Cir. 1997) (acknowledging the…