From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sills v. Bd. of Ed. of Hawthorne

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 18, 1964
42 N.J. 351 (N.J. 1964)

Opinion

Argued May 4, 1964 —

Decided May 18, 1964.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

Mr. Alexander E. Fasoli argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney). Messrs. Chandless, Weller Kramer, attorneys for William Boyle, filed a brief amicus curiae ( Mr. Ralph W. Chandless, of counsel).


The judgment entered in the Chancery Division declared R.S. 18:14-77 and R.S. 18:14-78 to be unconstitutional and enjoined the defendants from authorizing or practicing religious ceremonies in the public schools of Hawthorne. The judgment was patently sound under the principles expressed by the United States Supreme Court in Abington School Dist. v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203, 83 S.Ct. 1560, 10 L.Ed.2d 844 (1963), and it is accordingly:

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Sills v. Bd. of Ed. of Hawthorne

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 18, 1964
42 N.J. 351 (N.J. 1964)
Case details for

Sills v. Bd. of Ed. of Hawthorne

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR J. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND STATE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 18, 1964

Citations

42 N.J. 351 (N.J. 1964)
200 A.2d 615

Citing Cases

State v. Fiola

Our courts also have recognized that the Attorney General is an appropriate party to seek injunctive relief…

State Bd. of Ed. v. Bd. of Ed. of Netcong, N.J

In Sills v. Hawthorne Board of Education, 84 N.J. Super. 63 (Ch.Div. 1963), aff'd. 42 N.J. 351 (1964), the…