From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sidbury v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division
Sep 22, 2009
No. 7:08-CV-168-FL (E.D.N.C. Sep. 22, 2009)

Opinion

No. 7:08-CV-168-FL.

September 22, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M R") of United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling.

The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jones as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, defendant's motion is DENIED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the M R. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sidbury v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division
Sep 22, 2009
No. 7:08-CV-168-FL (E.D.N.C. Sep. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Sidbury v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:PARTHENIA M. SIDBURY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 22, 2009

Citations

No. 7:08-CV-168-FL (E.D.N.C. Sep. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

Pittman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

She also should fully explain her assessment of the medical opinions in the record, taking care to evaluate…

Jackson v. Colvin

Pl.'s Objections 7-8. Indeed, a number of courts in this circuit and elsewhere have held that a claimant's…