From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sickler v. Auto Owners Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Aug 19, 2015
871 N.W.2d 521 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

observing the insured alleged consequential damages beyond the work product itself—i.e., the negligent overhaul of his truck engine—due to property damage he later sustained when his truck engine failed

Summary of this case from Nat'l Sur. Corp. v. Westlake Invs., LLC

Opinion

No. 14–1636.

08-19-2015

Edward E. SICKLER, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant–Appellant.

Randall C. Stravers of Stravers Law Firm, Oskaloosa, for appellant. John H. Judisch of Stuyvesant & Benton, Carlisle, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Reversed and Remanded.


Summaries of

Sickler v. Auto Owners Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Aug 19, 2015
871 N.W.2d 521 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

observing the insured alleged consequential damages beyond the work product itself—i.e., the negligent overhaul of his truck engine—due to property damage he later sustained when his truck engine failed

Summary of this case from Nat'l Sur. Corp. v. Westlake Invs., LLC
Case details for

Sickler v. Auto Owners Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Edward E. SICKLER, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Aug 19, 2015

Citations

871 N.W.2d 521 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Pella Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

On the other hand, the bulk of Iowa state court decisions have held that an insured's defective workmanship…

Nat'l Sur. Corp. v. Westlake Invs., LLC

Here, unlike the Pursell situation, Westlake alleged property damage beyond the work product itself,…