From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shultz v. Wells

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Mar 22, 2010
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-646-WKW (M.D. Ala. Mar. 22, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-646-WKW.

March 22, 2010


ORDER


On March 3, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case. (Doc. # 38.) Plaintiff Miriam Clare Shultz filed objections to the Recommendation on March 19, 2010. (Doc. # 40). Upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objections were made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Shultz's objections (Doc. # 40) are OVERRULED;
2. the Recommendation (Doc. # 38) is ADOPTED;
3. Defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment (Doc. # 10), is GRANTED as set forth in the Recommendation;
4. costs are TAXED against the plaintiff; and
5. this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

Shultz v. Wells

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Mar 22, 2010
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-646-WKW (M.D. Ala. Mar. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Shultz v. Wells

Case Details

Full title:MIRIAM CLARE SHULTZ, D.C. v. R. BRYAN WELLS, et al

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Mar 22, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-646-WKW (M.D. Ala. Mar. 22, 2010)

Citing Cases

Calloway v. Stewart

"The substantive due process clause is rarely implicated by governmental action." Shultz v. Wells, 2010 U.S.…