From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shubert Found., Inc. v. 1700 Broadway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1993
198 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 16, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.).


We agree with the IAS Court that the clause in question was ambiguous. Accordingly, it was proper to receive the testimony of plaintiff's witnesses, who negotiated the terms of the original lease for the original parties in interest, to explain the intended operation of the clause (see, Sutton v East Riv. Sav. Bank, 55 N.Y.2d 550, 554; Globe Food Servs. Corp. v Consolidated Edison Co., 184 A.D.2d 278).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ross, Kassal, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Shubert Found., Inc. v. 1700 Broadway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1993
198 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Shubert Found., Inc. v. 1700 Broadway Co.

Case Details

Full title:SHUBERT FOUNDATION, INC., Respondent, v. 1700 BROADWAY Co., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 843

Citing Cases

Bamira v. Greenberg

We also reject as unpreserved defendant's claim that the trial court erroneously permitted plaintiff's…