From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shows v. Freedlander, Inc., the Mortgage People

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 1, 1988
523 So. 2d 376 (Ala. 1988)

Summary

granting motion to dismiss because the appellant "substantially failed to comply with Rule 28, Ala. R.App. P."

Summary of this case from Ex Parte Cleghorn

Opinion

86-798.

April 1, 1988.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Covington County; William H. Baldwin, Judge.

Cecil R. Shows, pro se.

James R. Clifton of Albrittons, Givhan Clifton, Andalusia, for appellee.


Upon consideration of appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 2(a)(2)(D), A.R.App.P., we find that the motion is due to be granted, the appellant having substantially failed to comply with Rule 28(a), A.R.App.P. The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Eady v. Stewart Dredging Construction Co., 463 So.2d 156 (Ala. 1985); Stover v. Alabama Farm Bureau Ins. Co., 467 So.2d 251 (Ala. 1985).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shows v. Freedlander, Inc., the Mortgage People

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 1, 1988
523 So. 2d 376 (Ala. 1988)

granting motion to dismiss because the appellant "substantially failed to comply with Rule 28, Ala. R.App. P."

Summary of this case from Ex Parte Cleghorn
Case details for

Shows v. Freedlander, Inc., the Mortgage People

Case Details

Full title:Cecil R. SHOWS v. FREEDLANDER, INC., THE MORTGAGE PEOPLE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 1, 1988

Citations

523 So. 2d 376 (Ala. 1988)

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Cleghorn

When we have dismissed an action for noncompliance with Rule 28, Ala. R.App. P., we have done so because of…