From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shomo v. Apple, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Feb 23, 2015
Civil Action No.: 7:14cv00040 (W.D. Va. Feb. 23, 2015)

Summary

finding it “appropriate for the court to consider both the complaint and the factual allegations in [pro se plaintiff's] response to the motion to dismiss in determining whether his claims can survive dismissal”

Summary of this case from Lyons v. Green

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 7:14cv00040

02-23-2015

CHARLES GLEN SHOMO, JR., Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC. and JOE FLORES, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter was referred to the Honorable Robert S. Ballou, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition. The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on February 2, 2015, recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted and this case be dismissed with prejudice. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the court is of the opinion that the report and recommendation should be adopted in its entirety. It is accordingly ORDERED that the February 2, 2015 report and recommendation (Dkt. # 19) is ADOPTED in its entirety, defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 13) is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and STRICKEN from the active docket of the court.

The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiff and to counsel of record.

Entered: February 23, 2015

/s/

Michael F. Urbanski

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Shomo v. Apple, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Feb 23, 2015
Civil Action No.: 7:14cv00040 (W.D. Va. Feb. 23, 2015)

finding it “appropriate for the court to consider both the complaint and the factual allegations in [pro se plaintiff's] response to the motion to dismiss in determining whether his claims can survive dismissal”

Summary of this case from Lyons v. Green

considering "both the complaint and the factual allegations in Shomo's response ... in determining whether his claims can survive dismissal"

Summary of this case from Hegedus v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC

considering "both the complaint and the factual allegations in Shomo's response to the motion to dismiss in determining whether his claims can survive dismissal"

Summary of this case from Cadmus v. Williamson

considering "both the complaint and the factual allegations in Shomo's response to the motion to dismiss in determining whether his claims can survive dismissal"

Summary of this case from Crawley v. Hinkle
Case details for

Shomo v. Apple, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES GLEN SHOMO, JR., Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC. and JOE FLORES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 23, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No.: 7:14cv00040 (W.D. Va. Feb. 23, 2015)

Citing Cases

Weinerth v. Talley

For the reasons discussed in McNaught, the court is of the opinion that the fact that Weinerth is not a…

Reedy v. Bank of Wells Fargo

In light of the Reedys' status as pro se plaintiffs, the court will "consider both the complaint and the…