From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shockey v. Illinois

U.S.
Oct 14, 1963
375 U.S. 22 (1963)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.

No. 20, Misc.

Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 25 Ill.2d 528, 185 N.E.2d 893.

John R. Snively for petitioner.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.


Summaries of

Shockey v. Illinois

U.S.
Oct 14, 1963
375 U.S. 22 (1963)
Case details for

Shockey v. Illinois

Case Details

Full title:SHOCKEY v . ILLINOIS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 14, 1963

Citations

375 U.S. 22 (1963)
84 S. Ct. 83

Citing Cases

Donnell v. Swenson

Mr. Justice Harlan dissented in all three because he felt that the cases should be set for argument of the…

Williams v. United States

We believe that the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act and our rules implementing the Act, insofar as…