From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shipley v. Schmitzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

June, 1928.

Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and O'Malley, JJ.


Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Sections 278-283 of the Civil Practice Act relate solely to motions formerly called demurrers. ( 255 Fifth Avenue Corporation v. Freeman, 120 Misc. 472.) Hence, section 282 of said act does not apply to a motion to dismiss a complaint made under rule 107, subdivision 6, and service of an answer to a complaint to which such a motion has been addressed would not be deemed an abandonment of such motion. Defendant does not, therefore, require an extension of time to answer pending an appeal from the order denying such motion.


Summaries of

Shipley v. Schmitzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Shipley v. Schmitzer

Case Details

Full title:FREDERIC B. SHIPLEY v. CHARLES SCHMITZER, Doing Business, etc

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1928

Citations

224 App. Div. 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Rothenberg v. Metzger

Rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice relates to motions to make a pleading more definite and certain, and…

Rathkopf v. Walker

That section relates solely to motions formerly called "demurrers". ( Shipley v. Schmitzer, 224 A.D. 730.)…