From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shinholster v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 5, 1979
257 S.E.2d 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

57799.

ARGUED MAY 9, 1979.

DECIDED JUNE 5, 1979.

Drug violation. Laurens Superior Court. Before Judge Towson.

H. G. Bozeman, for appellant.

Beverly B. Hayes, District Attorney, for appellee.


The defendant appeals his conviction for violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Held:

1. Error is assigned to the denial of the defendant's motion to change of venue or a continuance based on allegedly prejudicial pre-trial publicity.

"The law in Georgia is well established, and a myriad of cases so hold, that a motion for a change of venue addresses itself to the sound discretion of the trial judge, and that discretion will not be disturbed on appeal unless it can be shown that there was an abuse of this discretion." Coleman v. State, 237 Ga. 84, 90 ( 226 S.E.2d 911). "The test regarding prejudicial pre-trial publicity is whether the jurors summoned to try the case have formed fixed opinions as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant from their exposure to the pre-trial publicity." Potts v. State, 241 Ga. 67, 76 ( 243 S.E.2d 510).

The proof offered failed to establish actual prejudice to a degree that rendered a fair trial impossible. Watts v. State, 141 Ga. App. 127, 129 (3) ( 232 S.E.2d 590). We find no abuse of discretion in denying the motion.

2. The trial judge did not err in refusing to declare a mistrial. Judgment affirmed. Smith and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

ARGUED MAY 9, 1979 — DECIDED JUNE 5, 1979.


Summaries of

Shinholster v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 5, 1979
257 S.E.2d 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Shinholster v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHINHOLSTER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 5, 1979

Citations

257 S.E.2d 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
257 S.E.2d 342

Citing Cases

Taft v. State

Such matters rest largely in the discretion of the trial court, and no abuse of discretion having been shown,…

Claxton Poultry Co. v. City of Claxton

C. It is well established in Georgia that the matter of whether a change of venue is appropriate lies within…