From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shine v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb 5, 2014
135 So. 3d 289 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC13–1434.

2014-02-5

Carneri Fred SHINE, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 152 Fla. 400, 11 So.2d 889, 890 (Fla.1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So.2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus “is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act”), approved, 431 So.2d 986 (Fla.1983).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shine v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb 5, 2014
135 So. 3d 289 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Shine v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carneri Fred SHINE, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Feb 5, 2014

Citations

135 So. 3d 289 (Fla. 2014)