From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shine v. Fox Bros. Mfg. Co.

U.S.
Mar 7, 1910
216 U.S. 609 (1910)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.

No. 383.

Motion to dismiss submitted February 21, 1910. Decided March 7, 1910.

A direct appeal from the Circuit Court dismissed without opinion for want of jurisdiction. Appeal from 156 F. 357, dismissed.

THE motion to dismiss was made on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, for the reason that the jurisdiction of the court below rested on the diversity of citizenship of the parties, and no constitutional or other question was properly presented in the court below so as to confer jurisdiction of the appeal upon this court.

Mr. Shepard Barclay, Mr. Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Mr. Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for the appellants.

Mr. Herbert R. Marlatt, Mr. George S. Johnson, Mr. George M. Block and Mr. Frank H. Sullivan for the appellee.


In the circumstances disclosed by this record we are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the Circuit Court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.


Summaries of

Shine v. Fox Bros. Mfg. Co.

U.S.
Mar 7, 1910
216 U.S. 609 (1910)
Case details for

Shine v. Fox Bros. Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SHINE v . FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 7, 1910

Citations

216 U.S. 609 (1910)

Citing Cases

Rhodes Bros. Co. v. Musicians Union

This being the situation it seems to follow that the further dealings between the complainant and these…

Radio Station KFH Co. v. Musicians Ass'n, Local No. 297

Martin v. Luster, 85 F.2d 833, cited by appellant, is completely irrelevant. Shine v. Fox Bros. Mfg. Co., 156…