From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shiflet v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 6, 2010
50 So. 3d 1153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 4D09-4773.

October 6, 2010.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-9012 CF10A.

Randolph Shiflet, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Appellant already raised this very issue in a prior motion, which the trial court denied, and this court affirmed on appeal. See Shiflet v. State, 956 So.2d 466 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). In addition, as noted by the trial court, his claim that his sentence is illegal based upon State v. Huggins, 802 So.2d 276 (Fla. 2001), is without merit, as the ruling of Huggins was abrogated by statute for all crimes committed after July 1, 2001, which would include the offense committed by appellant.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shiflet v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 6, 2010
50 So. 3d 1153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Shiflet v. State

Case Details

Full title:Randolph SHIFLET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 6, 2010

Citations

50 So. 3d 1153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Plain v. State

Appellant committed his burglary offense in 1997 before the legislature superseded the holding of State v.…

McCleese v. State

PER CURIAM.Affirmed. Shiflet v. State, 50 So.3d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Mercado v. State, 13 So.3d 1112…